21/9/01
Been
Reading
the
Paper
Lately?
If
you
want
the
really
funny
stuff,
don't
look
in
the
humor
column.
It's
been
years
since
we
went
through
my
Old
Green
File;
let's
see
what's
new:
We
used
to
run
an
advice
column
on
our
economics
page,
because
there
are
some
brilliant
people
who
have
a
lot
to
teach
us
simpletons
about
high
finance.
Only
once
did
I
read
something
that
made
sense
to
me
--
these
profound
words
by
the
vice
president
of
a
bank:
"The
bottom
line
to
a
financier
is
the
financial
bottom
line.
People
invest
to
make
money."
I
always
find
great
stuff
on
the
economics
page.
This
gem
might
have
set
a
record
for
mixed
metaphors:
"At
the
moment
people
are
market
hopping.
They
are
pumping
one
up
and
then
jumping
ship
to
the
next
one.
It
is
a
game
of
pass-the-parcel
where
the
loser
is
the
one
left
holding
the
baby
when
the
liquidity
bubble
bursts."
I
don't
know
why
people
always
complain
that
foreign
correspondents
don't
have
a
good
grasp
of
the
situation
here.
This
AP
reporter
got
it
right:
JERUSALEM
(AP)
-
Thousands
of
Jews
named
Cohen
held
Passover
prayers
Monday
at
the
Western
Wall
in
Jerusalem,
while
a
small
group
of
extremists
named
Levy
tried
to
push
their
way
into
a
Muslim
holy
site.
I
was
completely
fooled
by
this
heading
on
a
recent
music
review:
Organ
Inauguration
Ceremony.
I
thought
it
was
about
a
circumcision.
Reader
Elias
Katz
caught
this
in
the
Post
classifieds:
"CLEANING
WOMAN,
5
days,
...
(Mazal)."
What's
funny
is
that
it
was
mistakenly
listed
under
MATRIMONIAL.
Elias
comments:
"I
know
they
are
hard
to
get
...
but
this?!"
We
once
had
this
listing
in
In
Jerusalem:
"Celebrate
Breastfeeding
Day
at
Misgav
Ladach
Hospital.
Activities
for
the
whole
family..."
Headline:
"Journalist
wins
suit
against
Jeruslam
Post."
(The
Post
shoulda
sued
the
journalist
who
wrote
that
headline.)
The
next
headline
--
which
ran
over
the
main
story
on
Page
One
--
is
vernacularly
called
a
two-headed
monster:
US
seeks
Barak,
Arafat
replies
to
peace
deal
draft
Its
meaning
is
altogether
different,
and
oddly
wrong,
when
"replies"
is
read
as
a
verb.
Back
when
Al
Gore
was
in
the
news
a
lot,
we
ran
an
opinion
piece
by
Dore
Gold.
Unfortunately,
the
byline
read
DORE
GORE
Funny,
but
we
didn't
have
any
trouble
with
this
byline:
MISHA
DZHINDZHIKHASHVILI
Not
only
did
we
manage
to
spell
that
correctly,
but
for
the
same
story,
we
succeeded
in
fitting
"Shevardnadze"
on
a
one
column
headline.
I
wouldn't
want
to
be
a
newspaper
deskman
in
Tbilisi.
Some
typos
rise
above
the
rest
to
earn
a
place
in
the
Old
Green
File:
"Palestinian
Legislative
Council
Speaker
Ahmed
Qurei,
when
asked
whether
the
negations
would
continue
if
Ariel
Sharon
is
elected
prime
minister..."
Daoud
Kuttab,
the
arch
Palestinian
apologist,
must
have
winced
when
he
read
this
typo
in
his
Post
column:
"...
including
Jewish
settlers
who
are
fragrantly
breaking
the
law..."
SOMETIMES
THE
humor
column
can't
compete
with
the
news
pages
for
wacky
satire.
Notorious
underworld
criminal
Nissim
Alperon
was
given
early
release
from
prison.
The
state
petitioned
against
the
Gush
Dan
parole
board's
decision.
Our
story
explained
that
"Alperon
had
gotten
early
releases
from
prison
twice
before
and
gone
straight
back
to
committing
crimes,
the
state
noted,
and
there
is
even
evidence
that
he
has
been
organizing
criminal
activity
from
prison."
Now,
the
clincher:
"The
parole
board
released
him
on
the
grounds
that
his
children
should
get
to
know
their
father."
On
my
list
of
the
top
10,000
reasons
this
country
is
a
mess
is
that
there's
no
respect
for
authority,
and
authority
is
so
laughable
it
doesn't
deserve
respect.
For
instance,
what
happened
recently
in
Eilat.
Health
inspectors
tell
the
Caesar
Hotel
it
must
completely
renovate
the
kitchen
and
dining
facilities.
Predictably,
the
hotel
management
ignores
the
order.
Some
time
later,
136
of
its
guests
--
including
children
and
babies
--
are
hospitalized
with
food
poisoning.
Do
the
authorities
close
the
hotel?
Arrest
the
managers?
Sue
them?
Fine
them?
Nah.
The
authorities
in
effect
reward
them.
According
to
our
report,
the
inspectors
"felt
that
this
time
there
was
no
need
to
close
the
entire
kitchen,
but
set
restrictions
on
what
could
be
served."
The
hotel
is
caught
red-handed
(but
surely
not
red-faced,
because
shame
and
embarrassment
are
unheard
of
in
this
country),
and
136
people
suffer
the
consequences
of
their
scofflaw
arrogance,
and
the
bottom
line
is,
the
hotel
actually
saves
money
because
the
authorities
compromise
their
earlier
orders.
Why
haven't
these
fools
in
charge
of
our
safety
learned
a
lesson
from
the
series
of
calamities
they
were
empowered
to
prevent?
Next
thing
you
know,
we'll
be
reading
that
the
perpetrator
of
the
Versailles
disaster
is
still
in
business.
Next
thing:
He
is.
"Dangerous
Pal-Kal
method
being
used
on
Modi'in
country
club,"
was
the
startling
headline.
Hardly
repentant,
not
exactly
laying
low
in
the
wake
of
national
shock
and
outrage,
the
perpetrator
of
the
worst
civilian
disaster
in
Israeli
history
is
at
it
again.
(Remember
what
I
said
about
shame
and
embarrassment?)
Someone
actually
hired
him!
According
to
our
report:
"Less
than
three
months
after
Jerusalem's
Versailles
banquet
hall
collapse,
the
inventor
of
the
hazardous
Pal-Kal
construction
method
used
in
the
hall
continues
to
work
unabated...
"Despite
being
under
police
investigation
...
Channel
2
filmed
the
inventor,
Eli
Ron,
constructing
the
rooftop
of
a
country
club
in
Modi'in
with
the
very
same
hazardous
materials."
At
a
time
of
widespread
panic
about
unsafe
flooring,
with
buildings
being
evacuated
and
condemned,
and
engineers
saying
it's
not
even
safe
to
test
Pal-Kal
floors
--
the
Modi'in
local
council,
plus
an
assortment
of
contractors,
engineers,
inspectors
and
authorities,
blithely
acquiesce
to
this
new
disaster-in-the-making,
utterly
oblivious
to
prevailing
sense
and
sensitivity.
(Yeah,
I
know
this
is
supposed
to
be
a
humor
column,
but
I
had
to
get
it
off
my
chest.)
IN
THE
"I
don't
know
whether
to
laugh
or
cry"
department,
I
give
you,
ladies
and
gentlemen
...
our
government:
The
lead-all
story
of
August
20
began
with
this
revelation
by
our
PM:
"The
IDF
is
conducting
secret
'commando
operations'
against
Palestinian
terrorists."
Immediately,
the
question
begs:
if
it's
secret,
why
tell?
The
very
next
sentence:
"Foreign
Minister
Shimon
Peres,
meanwhile,
confirmed
that
his
staff
is
conducting
secret
talks
with
Palestinian
officials
to
bring
about
a
cease-fire."
So
this
is
what
I
figure:
Sharon's
commando
operations
were
kept
secret
from
Peres,
and
Peres's
cease-fire
talks
were
kept
secret
from
Sharon,
and
God
forbid
they
should
tell
each
other,
but
to
the
rest
of
the
world,
that's
OK.
Besides,
wouldn't
the
secret
cease-fire
talks
be
somewhat
hampered
by
revelations
of
secret
commando
operations?
Someday,
I'd
like
to
fill
a
page
of
But
Seriously
with
stuff
from
the
front
page,
and
see
if
anyone
notices
they're
all
real
news
stories.
Like
this
item:
Three
Israeli
generals
meet
in
the
middle
of
a
war.
(This
sounds
like
a
joke,
but
it
really
happened.)
All
of
them
--
PM
Sharon,
Defence
Minister
Ben-Eliezer,
and
CGS
Mofaz
--
agree
to
send
tanks
into
Beit
Jala.
Sharon
wants
the
invasion
completed
by
lunchtime,
before
his
meeting
with
a
US
envoy.
Mofaz
wants
the
invasion
carried
out
under
cover
of
darkness.
Ben-Eliezer
wants
the
invasion
timed
to
"look
good
on
the
evening
news."
All
three
top
generals
in
the
land,
as
I
said,
agree,
yet
no
tanks
enter
Beit
Jala
(until
a
couple
of
weeks
later).
Funny,
eh?
No
wonder
the
Palestinians
are
laughing
at
us.