27/5/96
(For
Election Day Supplement)
Seeking
a Herd to Graze With
In
this town, individuality is politically incorrect.
Hillel asked: "If I am not for myself, who
is?"
Our greatest philosophers have tried to answer
that. "I yam what I yam," hypothesized Popeye.
Woody Allen said he wanted to be someone else. Garbo
vanted to be alone, Groucho didn't want to be with anyone
who would have him. Isherwood was a camera.
Everyone wise and glib exhorts us away from the
herd, or to its front; none of them tell us it's noble
to be a nobody within it. That's the nature of Western
philosophy, though apparently not too many people pay
much heed because there are still more followers than
leaders.
Jerusalem is so much a city of herds that even
the leaders are led. Maybe that's because most of us
immigrated from political cultures -- socialism, communism,
totalitarianism, fundamentalism -- that don't exactly
glorify free thinking.
I figure if I'm going to remain in this meshugga
town, it's time I joined a herd. A belief, a stream,
a politic, a leader, something or someone I could demonstrate
for, vote for, even throw stones in the name of, a group
whose principles I could promote on a bumper sticker
in a traffic jam. At present, the only Israeli logo
I burnish is that of my garagenik -- who in any case
has since emigrated.
With the elections coming up, finding a niche
has become a vital issue, because in this country, voting
for the Knesset is a form of mass group therapy.
The process of elimination doesn't help much,
as I'm not religious, Sephardi or an Arab, which in
this town reduces my belongability very narrowly. I'm
extremely moderate, which knocks out not only all of
the above, but everyone else as well. I'm neither a
new immigrant nor an old-timer.
Working from the other direction is not much
more helpful: I'm a left-handed, blue-eyed Canadian
with a perfect driving record, which not only does not
entitle me to a sizable discount on my car insurance,
but leaves me all the more ungroupable.
Somewhere in this town there must be some association,
organization, institution or affiliation I could get
attached to.
The Temple Mount Faithful? Nah. I'd sooner join
the Wakf.
The Histadrut would have me, but I'd sooner join
the Temple Mount Faithful. Women in Black would probably
prefer I join Women in Green, and vice versa.
The Committee for Concerned Citizens sounds nice,
but I'm too apathetic -- so much so that I wouldn't
even join a Committee for Apathetic Citizens.
IN
A SENSE, I have been grouped, though not exactly as
a card-carrying, flag-waving, bumper-sticker-pasting
joiner. Rather, I am like a helplessly vulnerable bit
of turf at which herds come to nibble.
Not long after I came to Israel, I became known
as Scrabble Sam. That gave every player someone to whom
to describe, in glorious detail, their finest plays,
their best games, their most loathed opponents: "I
had this word, that word, I made something from the
worst letters imaginable, giving me this score or that
score, and in my next five turns I did this and that,
and I just had to call you right away because
I knew you'd want to hear all about it."
Then I landed a job at this here Jerusalem Post.
Everyone I'd ever met in this country now had someone
to whom to describe, in passionate detail, what they
think of the paper. This writer stinks, that writer
is an idiot, how could you publish this or that.
Then, while I was still everyone's emergency
hotline for vignettes and opinions on Scrabble and the
Post, I became the father of triplets, and somehow I
had become a great expert on babies. I can't begin to
tell you how many baby pictures I've had thrust at me,
how many tales I've heard of gurgling cuties, squalling
unfortunates, or geniuses learning to say "Mama"
ahead of schedule. What woe and wonder I have heard,
of poor parents up all night with a puker or a teether
or a head-banger, or how triumphant it was when Junior
rolled over on his right side for the first time.
Then I had cancer. You can imagine. I became
a Wailing Wall. The agonizing details of experiences,
treatments, side effects, operations, the gamut of emotions.
I understand that people need to talk; unfortunately,
my chosen method of recovery was to think about my affliction
as little as possible.
The solution, I decided recently, is to let it
be known that I am an expert on sex.
The drawback is I still wouldn't know who to
vote for.
SINCE
EVERYTHING in this country is political anyway, that's
where I should probably seek an ilk, pay a fee for the
right to belong, and say "yay" and "boo"
in solidarity with others just like me. A political
party, say, or a lunatic fringe.
Solidarity is a natural bond among all but the
mythic majority -- because, I think, when you set aside
all the minorities, no one remains to comprise a majority.
That is why we have thriving political parties
representing Arabs, haredim, orientals, settlers, peaceniks;
unsuccessful but undaunted parties giving voice to taxi
drivers, income-tax payers, prisoners and pensioners;
political influence for Yemenites, Georgians, the Druse,
the North, the poor, the rich; parties on the right,
far right, extreme right, left, far left and extreme
left, everywhere on the spectrum and representing every
conceivable type of Israeli -- except for the hypothetical
majority at the middle. There is no middle: the Center
Party, which served this most fringe of political segments,
vanished years ago. I, of course, used to bestow my
treasured vote on them.
It would be easier to choose if I weren't so
determined to stick to my political conviction. I could
join both mainstreams, but not either: I am right-of-center
emotionally and left-of-center intellectually; impractical
sympathies, unsavory solutions.
My political dilemma is, on reflection, also
my religious one: the Conservative and Reform streams
are most enlightened, yet the shul I don't attend is
strictly Orthodox.
It is not easy being non-religious in Jerusalem.
Religious lifestyle here is, paradoxically, liberating;
it's secularism that is restrictive and confining.
It is especially not easy when you're
also disenchanted with secular lifestyle values: I mean,
when one side battles the other over the right to operate
discos throughout the city on Friday nights, which side
do I root for, the coercionists or the inconsiderates?
Therein might lie the crux of my conundrum: in
any issue, I can see where both sides are essentially
wrong, and right. Can you think of any Jerusalem herd
that would tolerate an attitude like that?
I
WAS finally put in my place by my wife, when she volunteered
me for membership in an organization she felt was especially
worthwhile. It was an organization she formed herself.
It would have been difficult for me to decline.
So now I am an activist, for Triplets Plus, the
Militant Mothers of Multiples. I am expected to attend
rallies and hold placards at demonstrations, and parade
about in a sloganeering T-shirt. Once we really get
going I suppose I'll have to lie down in the middle
of an intersection to protest the cost of diapers or
school-zoning policies.
I suggested it might be sufficient if I just
made a tax-deductible contribution, and even went so
far as to promise to display a "Triplets are Terrific!"
bumper sticker on my car -- you know, free advertising
for a good cause -- but I was threatened with a boycott.
It did no good to point out that I was at odds
with their politics, because they don't have any. Aha,
I said, then we have no hope of being taken seriously
unless we have a bloc of votes to deliver. And, I added,
when we promise votes, it's three at a time.
It seems I had a point there.
On the spot my wife decided we should have a
political wing, and a Knesset list, and I should head
it, and I should tour the country to clinch the support
of all the triplets from Metulla to Eilat, promising
things and making speeches and kissing babies. Lots
of babies.
This did not appeal to me at all; it seems I
would have to get so involved.
On the other hand, it might help me decide
who to vote for.