21/10/99
Cold
reception
You've heard, perhaps, that the
Israel Museum is getting a new reception
center. We've read in this newspaper all
about the design, the debate over the
design, the new design, the new debate,
this architect, that critic, and on and
on.
By the way, it's being funded by
a donation of $42 million.
Forty-two million dollars!!
A hundred and seventy million shekels.
It took my breath away.
I'm not exactly a bleeding-heart
espousing a welfare state, and I'm not
suggesting the museum's needs are unworthy.
Let me stress, too, that I'm not unappreciative
of this phenomenal gift to Israel. But
think about it: 42 million!
The issue is less of priority and
more of proportion. If it were three mill,
or five, there would be nothing to say
but thank you. If we didn't have a museum,
fine. If this weren't a country with so
many desperate needs in its most fundamental
sectors -- educational, medical,
industrial -- I'd say what the heck.
It's only a reception center, for
goodness sake! Sorry -- a reception center
and a parking lot.
Did I mention that it's costing
$42 million? Actually, it's not: the government
has to kick in an additional $8 million
of public funds. That's more than a buck
for every Israeli; I wonder how the miserable
jobless families of bankrupt Kiryat Malachi
feel about that.
All that money is going into nothing
more than an upgrade for an institution
of limited populist value. It is
so much money, it could make a monumental
difference, in one way or another, to
the entire nation.
How much is it? It's fully 1 percent
of the country's annual spending budget.
It seems highly frivolous. Certainly,
it is the donors' prerogative to choose
where their gift goes.
But!
Imagine if they had decided to
disburse this great fortune to revolutionize
the wretched education system. Virtually
every family would benefit, and we'd have
ourselves a nation bursting with braininess.
Well-paid teachers! Motivated students!
Imagine, classrooms of 20 instead of 40,
and a computer at every desk; Israeli
kids studying until 4 p.m. with free school
books in comfortable, air-conditioned
classrooms. University education for the
poor.
Imagine the relief on the hopelessly
burdened health-care system. Forty-two
million dollars happens to be the same
amount the Treasury is spending to expand
the basket of health services for new
drugs, technologies and treatments --
but it needs a total of NIS 2 billion,
which won't happen.
Imagine new factories infusing
new life in depressed towns infested with
unemployment. The greatest form of charity
is helping someone earn a living. That
much greater would be creating jobs for
thousands.
On the other hand, imagine,
a new museum entrance!
I
TOOK my snit to Martin Weyl, challenging
him for a justification. He had ready
answers.
Weyl funneled this donation to the museum,
as head of the Beracha Foundation, which
represents the Gruss Family's philanthropic
efforts. Weyl is also a former director
of the museum.
It so happens that Joseph Gruss
has contributed fantastic amounts to all
sectors, for the benefit of all Israelis.
"Our foundation has given
much more than $42 million in the past,
most of it anonymously: for education,
the handicapped, the blind, the retarded;
the largest community center in the country,
the school of technology -- you hardly
see his name on it, it was all done very
modestly. Another Gruss fund enables
every soldier that comes out of the army
to study.
"We've built about 100 creches
in this country. We've given a lot for
Russian immigrants to study, to get established;
big amounts to universities, big amounts
to all kinds of social institutions, for
health, libraries, research, the Academy
of Sciences. Wherever there's a real need,
this family has been there.
"And now, [the family] said
they want to do something nice to honor
the man who left all that money. Now they
want to do something for the spirit."
Weyl bristles at the criticism
he too often hears. "I would like
this country to be able to say, 'Thank
you, Joseph Gruss,' but instead, I feel
it's like, no good deed goes unpunished.
Those people are being attacked left and
right. Such uncivilized behavior! Even
if you don't want it, say it in a nice
way, don't say 'stick it.'
"You heard what happened in
the Technion a few weeks ago? A donor,
Bill Davidson, wanted to give them $30
million, but there was infighting, so
he said thank you very much, and he left.
"We take it for granted, we
live off their money, we're not gracious,
we don't have the spirit to acknowledge
them correctly. We're always questioning
what they do, and why they do it, and
should they do it. It hurts me.
"I had to train the staff
in the museum to be nice to donors --
I know, it sounds silly!"
With my reasoning, he said, "There
would not be a museum today. It was built
at a time (1965) when everyone said, 'Who
needs a museum?' "
The master plan has been rethought
over the past two decades. It was originally
designed as an acropolis, where people
enter from all sides, but security concerns
have changed that. The complex is bedeviled
by a wide range of infrastructural shortcomings,
galling to what Weyl says is "one
of the 20 biggest museums in the world,
and the most important museum in the world
to the Jewish people."
The government's $8 million share is misleading:
it's a tax exemption. "The donors
said, if we're giving all this money,
we shouldn't also have to pay the VAT."
The wrong people are being criticized,
says Weyl.
"It's a pity there aren't
more people willing to give. There are
now so many rich Israelis. Why
do we have to depend on people from abroad?
"I remember Shulamit Aloni
and Yossi Beilin saying to the Americans,
we don't need your money. But it's not
true. The museum would die, the hospitals
would die if not for those people.
"Israelis don't know how to
say thank you, but despite this, these
people continue to give, because they
think it's important. And they do it from
their heart.
Weyl shakes his head in disillusioned
frustration. "I didn't realize it
would be so difficult to give so much."